← Today's news

Can Opposing Data Centers Help Progressives Win?

Mother Jones · left 5 techniques found 21.6% of sentences flagged

Read the original article at Mother Jones →

What the model flagged

Analyzed 2026-07-31 19:21 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote below isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.

Findings may include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting. We flag manipulation techniques wherever they appear, including inside quotations — so check each quote against the original before drawing a conclusion about the outlet.

Loaded Language 92%

Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.

Appeal To Fear 85%

Anxiety about threats or dire consequences used to override rational analysis.

Name Calling 80%

The term 'tech billionaires' is used as a derogatory label to frame the opposition as wealthy elites rather than engaging with their arguments — for example: 'tech billionaires'

“tech billionaires”

Bandwagon Appeal 65%

The phrase 'growing crop of progressive candidates' implies a swelling movement that sees this position as a winning strategy, subtly pressuring readers to view opposition to AI data centers as the popular and correct stance — for example: a growing crop of progressive candidates

“a growing crop of progressive candidates”

Conspiracy Appeal 75%

The framing implies a coordinated, unified elite secretly or deliberately imposing data centers on communities against the public's will, suggesting a hidden agenda by powerful actors — for example: 'the ruling class is united behind this plan to push data centers in our communities'

“the ruling class is united behind this plan to push data centers in our communities”

Analyzed automatically with Biasly's fine-tuned model. These are manipulation techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →