Read the original article at Mother Jones →
Findings may include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting. We flag manipulation techniques wherever they appear, including inside quotations — so check each quote against the original before drawing a conclusion about the outlet.
Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.
The term 'conservative extremists' is a derogatory label applied to a group to discredit them rather than engage with their arguments — for example: 'conservative extremists'
“conservative extremists”
Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence.
Creates anxiety and fear to influence decisions rather than using logical reasoning
The sentence presents 'decades of evidence' as settled fact against the opponents' claims, while listing their specific claims (ER visits, water pollution, coercion) only to dismiss them wholesale without engaging with any individual data points — for example: 'Despite decades of evidence to the contrary, they insist mifepristone is unsafe'
“Despite decades of evidence to the contrary”
“churning out junk science, claiming abortion pills are sending large numbers of patients to emergency rooms, polluting the water supply, and enabling the coercion of women”
Analyzed automatically with Biasly's fine-tuned model. These are manipulation techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →